Investment Strategies
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: LGT Group In Singapore Gazes Into The Economic Crystal Ball

This publication recently spoke in Singapore to LGT Group, the Liechtenstein-headquartered firm with a global footprint. The interview ranged from gold price developments to Asia economic prospects.
Simon Grose-Hodge is the Head of Investment Advisory for LGT Group, Singapore. Grose-Hodge is one of the group’s main investment strategists with 30 years of market experience. He is also LGT’s main spokesperson, representing the group across all media outlets and writing daily, monthly and quarterly outlooks for clients. Before he joined the Liechtenstein-headquartered firm in 2007, he was a market editor for Bloomberg News in Singapore, where he was responsible for building up the Asian foreign exchange and bond coverage in both print and broadcast teams.
Before his role at Bloomberg News, Grose-Hodge worked extensively in the banking industry, including for HSBC in Hong Kong in its treasury division, covering the foreign exchange and fixed income businesses in Asia. This followed a period at Morgan Grenfell, where he set up and ran its foreign exchange and fixed income business in Asia. He later took over the foreign exchange trading desk for Deutsche Bank when the two firms merged. He began his banking career in 1980 when he joined Midland Bank in London.
We sat down with him recently in Singapore to get his opinion on some current themes.
With so many current geopolitical hotspots both live and
potential do you have a safe-haven play?
The best safe-haven strategy is simply to buy protection against
your equity portfolio. Volatility is still around multi-year
lows, making put options a relatively economic way of protecting
down-side tail-risk while staying invested. Traditional
safe-havens such as buying gold, or oil in the case of Iraq, are
often inefficient and rely more on astute timing.
A great many experts predicted that the US Federal
Reserve would have already discontinued quantitative easing by
now. What is your take on this?
The Fed communicated a clear exit strategy for QE, which they
have stuck to. This surety gave markets confidence, which has
been reflected in Treasury yields now being lower than when
tapering [winding down of QE] started. The Fed will face a more
difficult task in achieving the same outcome for the first rate
increase.
Based on what you have seen so far do you expect Janet
Yellen [Fed chair] to be inventive or dormant in
2015?
We would lean toward inventive, which from our perspective also
means dormant! We suspect the Fed will be happy to stay behind
the curve in order to support the recovery and may not start to
tighten as early as many analysts are now predicting. Secondly,
the first move may be inventive, by choosing to raise the
interest paid on reserves as a way of withdrawing liquidity,
rather than a more broad-based rate hike.
Are you afraid a “eurozone crisis” is back - if it
ever went away?
There is no crisis, due to the European Central Bank finally
waking up to reality and committing to unconventional measures.
Stronger global growth will also prop up export sales and help
offset disappointing domestic economies.
On the UK, if the Scotland’s referendum on independence
on 18 September produces a “yes” vote, what will happen to
sterling in the short term, given the key contributions to the UK
economy of oil and gas from Scotland, as well as issues over
whether firms will relocate south?
Sterling will weaken sharply on a “yes” vote, as much due to
uncertainty as anything else. Losses will be more enduring
against the dollar, which is in a solid uptrend, than against
European currencies that will still have weaker fundamentals even
if the UK economy is damaged.
“Abenomics” - in your opinion is this going to end in
smiles or scowls?
We are still fans of Abenomics and are not surprised at the slow
pace of reform, bearing in mind the amount of internal
opposition. Nevertheless, progress is being made and Abe has
shown he is not scared to replace officials that block his
agendas, such as at the Health Ministry. We remain overweight
Japanese equities with a hedge against Yen weakness.
What do you like across the rest of Asia?
Asia is our preferred destination within emerging markets for all
asset classes (equities, credit and currencies), although we are
still underweight emerging markets overall. Within Asia, we
prefer North Asia over ASEAN as a region. Equity markets offer
better valuations and the currencies are protected by
current-account surpluses.
Gold hasn’t rallied much despite global tensions. Are
there other precious metals you think should be
considered?
For some time, we have held a long position in palladium rather
than gold. The supply/demand dynamics are favourable and
fundamentals are supported by industrial use in the automotive
industry. Long palladium versus gold remains a good relative
value trade in a bullish dollar environment.
What equity markets look best to you from now until the end of
2014?
From a valuation perspective, Europe has some catching up to do
and is now supported by a more accommodative ECB. We particularly
like the bigger periphery markets such as Spain and Italy. In
Asia, Taiwan would be our top pick, along with Japan.
Do you have any thoughts on the Alibaba IPO?
With the caveat that clients are unlikely to get any allocation,
the pricing suggests the IPO should go well. Investors that have
a bullish view on the stock should consider buying a company such
as Japan’s Softbank as a proxy, as it owns more than 30 per cent
of Alibaba.
With new Apple and Samsung launches and with various
wearable devices gaining traction do you see those bolstering the
Asian technology-manufacturing sector?
Technology is our favourite sector of the market and because of
that, we also like Taiwan. Beyond Smartphones and the like, we
expect capital spending to increase, with a lot of that going
toward IT and software upgrades.